Since the late 70s and into the millinium.
Many "engineers" have made public, their inventions of reading
probabilities into Technical Indicators. Many Technical Analysis Gurus
came to the forefront to sell their research findings. To name a few,
The Grand daddy being Charles Dow and his Dow theory which later lead to the creation of the Dow Jones Indexes.
Rene Descarte who introduced the Spiral studies.
Leonardo Da vincci who fostered the fabonacci principles,
W.D. Gann, who introduced Cyclic Studies of Squaring time and price.
R.N.Elliot, who introduced the Elliot Wave Studies
W.Wilders.Who introduced the mathematics of calculating overbought and
oversold markets by his introduction of the DI+,DI-, ADX lines and the
Relative Strength Index.
The Stocastics, MACDs, ……………………………...etc
If one was to impliment all these studies onto their charts. What you
will see is a beautiful piece of art, displaying very impressive hog
wash, that do nothing but dazzle the uninitiated. If anything else it
'll confuse you even more.
Then you have the charting specialist who have introduced many ways to chart eg,
Linear Charts, HiLoClose Bar Charts, Japanese candlestick charts, Point
& Figuring, John Hill's Bar Chart congestion & reversal
patterns, reverse point waves, pivots, fractuals, ………..etc
Today, we find lots of originally and mutated techniques and methodologies available to the Chartist or Technicians.
What many fail to realise, is that all these studies, basically are
statistical tables plotted in graphic form to present a "picture" to
assist traders in their decision process. The maxim being, that a
picture tells a thousand words.
"It is not theirs (the charts) to reason why,
But to signal Sell or Buy,
For the traders to do or die,
Hoping that the signal does not lie,
I would, from my many years of studies, go so far as to say, that they
all work, some more than others but they all do serve a purpose. (to
give traders, the "guts" to do or die)
If I may borrow from the quotes of Sir Winston Chirchill.
"That you can lie to some people all the time, all people some of the time, but not to all people, all the time."
Similarly, theses studies can work in some market conditions all the
time, all market conditions some of the time, but not all market
conditions all of the time."
Think about what I've just quoted very carefully.
The problem with some people and some professional Technical Analyst
today ( being a certified Technical Analyst myself ) is that they use
the Technical studies as if, it were the "Holy Grail" of trading &
their pathway to the millions.
How far that is from the truth.
Any person with a good brain on their shoulders, will ultimate come to
the realisation that these are just tools. Tools that are built on
historical and lagging databases. Moreover the rigidity of the
parameters used in the studies imposes rigid responses to changing
market conditions. Have we forgotten that the market is a live beast
that learns and adapts to trader behaviours? Many have forgotten that
the market is the sum total of the behaviour of the participants engaged
in the market place. These tools are used for measuring the markets
health, not so unlike the thermometer to a doctor, or the measuring tape
to a carpenter, just a tool.
Then how is it possible that these studies themselves can be considered the "Holy Grail"?
It may be due to ignorance (being new and uniniatiated), lazyness, or
just plain stubborness ( a little knowledge is a dangerous thing). Of
course it is not nice for me, to tell you about those who have "a little
knowledge", trying to scam those who know less than them. That's
another story.
Some do so, because of a very new disease discovered recently, the sickness of "the chance".
If you use the Technical studies as your "Holy Grail", I have only one word for you, GAMBLER.
I put it to you, that, to consider your Technical Studies to be more
than what they are is a "fallacy" in trading the markets, not so unlike
martingale gamblers' fallacy. It can lead you to a very dark place.
What many traders do not know, or may fail to recognise, is that your
success in taming the markets, is comprised of a mix of ingredients. Not
so unlike in baking cakes.
I suggest three very important ingredients. One is " Market Structure ",
the other is "YOU", then Capitalisation. Of course there are many more
components, for the moment these seems of dominant importance, in my
humble opinion.
I hope you will think about what I've said very carefully.
I shall try to push these doors ajar for you slowly to show you the
light at the end of the tunnel (please hope its no on-coming train), God
willing.
No comments:
Post a Comment